Listen to a reading of this article:
Studying the unfolding of the new mainstream UFO narrative has been very interesting, because it highlights the dynamics I always talk about in a fresh light which makes them easier to point to.
One theme that keeps resurfacing is people marvelling at how low-key the public response to the whole thing has been. One might expect the US government officially stating that the military has been frequently encountering strange unknown aircraft of unthinkable technological advancement would rank a little higher in public interest, but so far that really hasn't been the case.
A YouTuber recently summed up this sentiment with a 13-minute rant about how weird it is that everyone isn't screaming about this all day long:
I've seen numerous attempts to explain the unexpectedly apathetic response to the fact that UFOs are in the news every day now, the most common being that people have so much on their plate these days that even the possibility of extraterrestrials buzzing US navy ships just doesn't rank high on their priorities. Others suggest that it's such an obvious military psyop that the public is dismissive of the story.
Neither of these offerings are particularly convincing in my opinion. We see vapid nonsense attracting mountains of public interest every day, so the idea that people have no mental bandwidth for this story doesn't hold water. While the belief that the UFO narrative looks like some kind of military psyop is widely accepted among the sort of people who'd be likely to read this article (I've been saying it for a while now myself), skepticism toward suspicious US government claims is not a very widespread posture for people to hold in the mainstream public.
It seems pretty clear to me that the reason there's not as much public interest in this story as you'd expect is because it doesn't fit neatly into any of the little boxes that people have been trained to file news into in this society. There's no partisan angle to it, so it doesn't appeal to any of the egoic constructs to which the general public tends to hook incendiary news stories.
The likelihood of a news story going viral in our society has little to do with its newsworthiness, its unusualness, or even whether or not it is factually accurate. The single most likely factor in whether or not a news story will have mass appeal is whether it appears to validate the worldview of one of the two mainstream political factions. This is why the mainstream media have been deliberately sowing partisan divisiveness and marketing toward increasingly distant partisan echo chambers instead of just reporting the news; they have an obvious profit motive to do so, because tickling people's egos with hate porn and illusory validation is the best way to get clicks and generate ad revenue.
This is why those who promoted the theory that Trump was a secret Russian agent saw their ratings soar for years before it was conclusively discredited by the very Special Counsel they'd been literally singing Christmas carols and lighting prayer candles to until then. There is more evidence that space aliens are cruising around in Earth's atmosphere than there ever was that Vladimir Putin had covertly infiltrated the highest levels of the US government, but because it inflamed liberal passions and made them feel like their partisan worldview was about to be vindicated any minute, it sold like crack.
You can immediately tell if something is going to go viral by how politically tinged it is and how mainstream the appeal of those politics are. A story about how schools want to make your kids transgender. A popular conservative acting like an idiot. A black Trump supporter saying Trump isn't racist. Marjorie Taylor Greene doing literally anything. Take it too far outside the mainstream, like the US government getting caught tampering with an OPCW investigation in Syria for example, and you won't see a ton of clicks, but if it appeals to tens of millions of mainstream partisans you will.
In a society that's enslaved to egoic consciousness as ours is, the things that generate the most public interest will be those which flatter or infuriate common egoic constructs. This is not unique to politics; advertisers have raked in vast fortunes by associating products with common cultural mind viruses like body image issues and personal inadequacy, and TV show hosts like Jerry Springer and Maury Povich figured out decades ago that you can attract massive ratings by letting people feel smug and superior at the sight of poor and uneducated guests acting out emotionally.
To make something go viral, it needs to appeal to the ego. Advertisers understand this. Media executives understand this. Propagandists understand this.
Creating big psychological identity structures out of our politics makes the job of the propagandists so very much easier; it's like a lubricant which lets mass-scale psyops glide smoothly into public consciousness. From there it's a very easy task to get people hating Russia or China for this or that partisan reason, or to get people believing Trump or Biden are helping the American people despite their both continuing and expanding the same murderous and oppressive status quo of their predecessors.
This is why the partisan divide is the most heated and contentious it's ever been, while the actual behavior of each mainstream party when it's in power brings in only the most superficial of changes. The oligarchs who own the political/media class desire the continuation of the status quo upon which they have built their empire, but they also want to keep the public as plugged in as possible to the partisan perspectives which facilitate the propaganda that cages our minds.
The solution to this, on an individual level, is to dismantle any egoic attachment you might have to either of the mainstream political factions which preserve the status quo. This includes any attachment to the phony populism of progressive Democrats, and it includes any attachment to the phony populism of Trumpian Republicans. These factions within the mainstream factions are themselves propaganda constructs which will never be permitted to advance any agenda that isn't desired by the oligarchic empire; they serve only to keep people who would be inclined to reject mainstream politics plugged in to mainstream politics.
And of course the ultimate solution to this problem is for humanity to awaken from the ego. All propaganda relies on egoic hooks in public consciousness to circulate itself, so if humanity begins dropping its habit of creating psychological identity structures altogether (which it looks like it might), we will become harder and harder to propagandize. Since humanity's collective problems ultimately boil down to the fact that sociopaths manipulate our minds at mass scale, such a transformation would make a healthy new world not just possible but inevitable.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, following me on Facebook, Twitter, Soundcloud or YouTube, or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi, Patreon or Paypal. If you want to read more you can buy my books. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here.
Not sure where my experience falls on the shite continuum but l recently contacted my senators and congressman -- all democrats -- regarding out unwarranted support of organized racism in the form of Israel.
The form letters l received were completely unresponsive to the points l raised. Notably missing in the canned responses were the words occupation, apartheid, land theft, war crime, or right of return. The right of self defense was there, but glaringly and crassly only applied to the occupiers and not to the occupied.
The attempt to transform the simple and the unjust into the complicated and the honorable was obvious, giving our politicians something to utter should the subject ever come up.
I know this is long and l appreciate having this platform on which to vent; let's hope l haven't abused it. Caitlin's article triggered my frustration with Israel, realizing that -- like UFOs -- there is no hook since both parties fuel this madness equally.
Thanks for listening.
I see the "boy who cries wolf" syndrome in the 'new' UFO reporting garnering little mainstream attention as it's been reported far too often to be hoaxes. Similar the the Bigfoot phenomena of the late 60's(Yes, I'm old), all eventually proven to be hoaxes. Now we get videos supposedly from F/A-18 Hornets with advanced tracking that loses its target going too fast to keep up. Maybe so. I'd actually like to believe it. But just like the "alien autopsy" of the late 80's, it too was a hoax.
So the MSM, corporate world moves on to juicer targets that enthrall viewers with more scary 'wow' factor than fuzzy UAP videos released/leaked? by the military. When one lands on the White House grounds, evading intense radar of the airspace, and tell humans to "cool it, or else", I'll believe for reals. 'Till then, Peace, The Ol' Hippy